Chapter 2Mathematical Reasoning

Proof Techniques

Direct, indirect, contradiction, contrapositive, cases

Concept

Beyond inference rules, we have proof techniques — patterns for building
a complete argument.

Direct proof. To prove PQP \Rightarrow Q: assume PP, then derive QQ
through valid inferences.

Proof by contradiction. To prove PP: assume ¬P\neg P, derive a contradiction
(some R¬RR \land \neg R), conclude PP.

Proof by contrapositive. To prove PQP \Rightarrow Q: prove ¬Q¬P\neg Q \Rightarrow \neg P
instead.

Proof by cases. When the problem splits naturally — e.g. "for all xx, P(x)P(x)"
where xx is either even or odd — prove each case separately.

Proof by exhaustion. When the domain is small and finite, check every element.

Proof by counterexample. To DISPROVE x.P(x)\forall x. P(x), find one xx with ¬P(x)\neg P(x).

Animation — proof techniques
Transcript — click a line to jump6 cues
  1. 0.0sProof Techniques
  2. 1.2sSix tiles flip into view one at a time
  3. 3.9sDirect, Contrapositive, Contradiction appear
  4. 5.5sCases, Induction, Construction fill the second row
  5. 6.7sEach tile shows a one-line signature
  6. 9.6sSix tools, pick whichever makes argument cleanest
Practice — score 100% to advance
Multiple choice
Q1
Direct proof of PQP \Rightarrow Q: assume PP, derive ___.
Q2
What is the contrapositive of PQP \Rightarrow Q?
Q3
When do you use proof by cases?
Q4
Which technique proves x.P(x)\forall x. P(x)?
Q5
How do you DISPROVE xN.x2x\forall x \in \mathbb{N}. x^2 \geq x?
Q6
Proof by contradiction is most useful when…
Loading…